Ultimate Fighting Calendar

UFC & MMA Blog · Editorials

Van vs Pantoja: the model, the market and our readers disagree

UFC 331 predictions: our model gives Joshua Van 71.9 percent over Alexandre Pantoja, the betting market says 56, and our readers still pick Pantoja.

Author
Mate Bersenadze
Published
Sep 19, 2026
Read time
5 min read
Tags
ufc · ufc-331 · joshua-van · alexandre-pantoja · betting-odds · predictions
Alexandre Pantoja

Three groups of people have looked at Joshua Van vs Alexandre Pantoja this week and come back with three different fights.

Our model has the champion at 71.9 percent. The sportsbooks, after five weeks of calling it nothing, have crept to roughly 56 percent on him. And the readers filling in the UFC 331 pick'em have Pantoja ahead, 63 picks to 53.

I find that gap interesting for a reason that has nothing to do with who is right. The three groups are not disagreeing about the same evidence. They are weighing three different things, and only one of them is weighing the thing that actually decided the first fight.

The market sat still for five weeks and then moved every day

Here is the part our own odds history makes plain. From August 8 through September 12, the median line across twenty books on Van vs Pantoja never left a five cent window: minus 112, minus 121, minus 117, minus 113, minus 112, back and forth, for thirty six days. A pick'em with a champion in it.

Then on September 13 it moved, and it has not stopped since. Minus 126, minus 131, minus 131, minus 132, minus 135, minus 138, and minus 141 as of this morning. Seven consecutive days in one direction, no correction, no bounce.

That is not a reaction to news. Nothing happened to Pantoja on September 13. Renato Moicano vs Brian Ortega came off the card on the 15th and the UFC pushed every segment back thirty minutes the same day, but neither of those things touches a flyweight title fight. What it looks like is the ordinary fight week tightening: the books that were holding a lazy number because nobody was betting it finally had to price the fight for real.

Strip the vig and minus 141 against plus 120 is about 56 percent. Which means the market spent five weeks disagreeing with itself and has arrived, one cent a day, at a number that is still fifteen points short of ours.

The model never moved because it was never looking at the 26 seconds

Alexandre Pantoja Photo: Sexto Round / CC BY 3.0

Our model gives Van 71.9 percent, and when you open up what is driving that number the largest single contributor is not the knockout. It is age. Van is 24.9 years old and inside his athletic prime. Pantoja is 36.4 and the model reads him as 3.4 years past his. That one input outweighs everything the two men have done to each other.

The second contributor is the run. Van carries a seven fight win streak into this; Pantoja carries none. Van has eleven UFC fights at a 91 percent win rate, Pantoja has eighteen at 78 percent. On raw quality the two are close, and our rating separates them by barely fifty points, which is a coinflip with a lean. The distance comes almost entirely from where each man is standing on his own curve.

That is worth saying plainly because it cuts against the obvious read. The obvious read is that the model is overreacting to the 26 second knockout at UFC 323, when Van took the belt off Pantoja in less time than it takes to read this paragraph. It is not. A model that was overreacting to that would have Van at 85 percent. What it actually says is duller and harder to argue with: a 36 year old flyweight who has been champion since 2023 is a worse bet than a 24 year old who has won seven in a row, and the first fight is a tiebreaker rather than the case.

The readers are the only group backing the older man

And yet 63 of our readers picked Pantoja and 53 picked Van, out of 179 people who have filled in at least part of this card so far. That is the only one of the three groups with the former champion in front.

I do not think that is stubbornness. I think it is the most human of the three reads, and it goes roughly like this: Pantoja has been in five flyweight title fights, he submitted Kai Kara-France in the third round at UFC 317 and Kai Asakura in the second at UFC 310, he has never once looked like a man who needed the full twenty five minutes explained to him, and the fight that cost him the belt lasted 26 seconds. Twenty six seconds is not a fight. It is an accident with a bell on either end.

The counter is that Van did not then vanish. He defended the belt against Tatsuro Taira at UFC 328 in May and finished him in the fifth round, which is the single least flukey way to win a championship fight: you outlast a live opponent for four rounds and then take him out in the last one. The UFC's own P4P board has Van at number 11 and Pantoja at 13, and Van slid a spot in the September 15 update without losing.

What Saturday actually settles

The neat version of this is that one of the three groups gets proven right tonight and the other two learn something. That is not how a single fight works, and I would rather not pretend otherwise.

What one fight does settle is narrower and more useful: whether 26 seconds was information. If Pantoja spends twenty five minutes making Van fight in the phases where a 36 year old former champion is still the better man, then the market's five weeks of indecision were the honest reading and our model's age term was doing too much work. If Van finishes him again, the age gap was never a curve on a chart. It was just true.

Main card is 9:00 p.m. ET from Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles. Live results and scorecards are here.