Skip to content
MMA Calendar

UFC & MMA Blog · Technique

Jai Herbert vs Matheus Camilo: How Herbert Won the Co-Main

Herbert vs Camilo breakdown from UFC Fight Night: Allen vs Duncan: a round-two reversal, 19 body shots and three 29-28 cards our preview never saw coming.

Author
Mate Bersenadze
Published
Oct 11, 2026
Read time
7 min read
Tags
UFCUFC Fight Night 2026-10-11Jai HerbertMatheus CamiloData
Post on X

On Saturday morning I wrote that Matheus Camilo beats Jai Herbert by holding him. The whole case was control time: Herbert's UFC losses came with men leaning on him, his wins came without, and Camilo was a wrestler with a 54 percent takedown rate. I picked Camilo by decision. Our model gave him 65.7 percent and the sportsbook consensus closed with him at -189, Herbert at +159.

Herbert won 29-28 on all three cards.

The part that stings is that the key was right. Control time did decide the fight. Camilo got his takedowns, two of four, and held Herbert for 2 minutes and 41 seconds. Herbert held Camilo for 2 minutes and 55 seconds. The man I spent 1,100 words describing as the one who gets pinned finished the night as the one doing the pinning, and I had not written a single sentence about that possibility. So let's take a look at what actually happened in the co-main of UFC Fight Night: Allen vs Duncan, and hold the preview up against it.

Three rounds, three identical cards

Eric Colón, Michael Bell and Sal D'Amato scored it the same way round for round: 10-9 Camilo in the first, 10-9 Herbert in the second and third. No split, no outlier, nothing to argue about. Here is the round-by-round sheet from our stats, Camilo first.

RoundSig. strikesTotal strikesTakedownsControlJudges
113-914-91 of 1 - 0 of 01:02 - 0:00Camilo x3
26-87-291 of 1 - 0 of 01:03 - 2:08Herbert x3
324-3730-420 of 2 - 0 of 10:36 - 0:47Herbert x3
Total43-5451-802 of 4 - 0 of 12:41 - 2:5529-28 Herbert x3

The first round went exactly to plan. Camilo landed his only takedown attempt, held Herbert for 1:02 and out-landed him 13 to 9. Herbert threw 42 significant strikes and landed nine of them, 21 percent. If you had stopped watching after five minutes you would have filed the preview as correct.

Round two: the takedown that turned over

Then came the round that decided the fight, and it started with Camilo doing the thing I said he needed to do. He shot, he got it (one for one again), and he banked 1 minute and 3 seconds of control.

Then Herbert reversed him. Our stats have zero reversals for Herbert in his previous ten UFC fights. This was his first, and it came at the exact moment the whole Camilo plan depended on. Once he came out on top, Herbert held position for 2 minutes and 8 seconds of the round and landed 29 total strikes to Camilo's seven. Only eight of Herbert's 29 counted as significant. The other 21 are the short, unglamorous shots that land in tight from top position and against the fence, the ones that never make a highlight but fill a judge's notepad.

That is the hole in the preview. I built a table of how long Herbert's opponents controlled him and treated the number as a one-way street: control is something done to Herbert. I never ran the same lens on Camilo. Had I done it, I would have found this:

Camilo's UFC fightsResultOpponent's control time
Gabe Green, May 2025Loss, submission R22:12
Viacheslav Borshchev, Nov 2025Win, decision0:24
Nazim Sadykhov, Jun 2026Win, TKO R10:00
Jai Herbert, Oct 2026Loss, decision2:55

Two wins with his opponents holding him for 24 seconds combined. Two losses with his opponents holding him for over two minutes each. And it is the same shape both times: Camilo takes the man down, and the man ends up in control. Against Green he landed a takedown in each round, and Green still spent 2 minutes and 3 seconds of the second in control before the submission at 3:43. Borshchev reversed him too, in the third round of a fight Camilo won anyway. The preview actually told the Green story in full and drew the wrong lesson from it. I wrote "he has to finish it in a position he can keep." True. I just did not ask what happens when he can't, against a man our records list as a Brazilian jiu-jitsu brown belt, same as Camilo.

Round three: the Borshchev warning comes due

The one part of the preview that held up is the warning, and I'd rather own the wrong pick than pretend I saw it coming. Against Borshchev last November, Camilo's third round was a mess: one takedown in three tries, 13 seconds of control, out-landed 37 to 17. I wrote that his wrestling banks rounds early and his striking does not hold the line on its own when the shots stop landing late.

On Saturday the shots stopped landing. Camilo went zero for two on takedowns in the third. Herbert threw 78 significant strikes in that round alone and landed 37, while Camilo landed 24 of 39. Read that last number again, because it is not a bad round for Camilo. Sixty-two percent accuracy is excellent. He simply threw half as much as a 38-year-old who was supposed to be, by our model's reckoning, about five years past what it treats as a fighter's prime.

The body work nobody previewed

Here is the detail I find most interesting, and it is not one I mentioned at all. Herbert landed 19 of 28 body strikes, 68 percent. To the head he landed 25 of 116, 22 percent.

That split tells you what he was doing. The head shots were the volume, the thing that kept Camilo's guard high and his feet busy. The body shots were the scoring. Camilo's 66 percent striking defense, the number the model leaned on, held up almost to the decimal: Herbert landed 54 of 157, 34 percent, meaning Camilo stopped 66 percent of what came at him. The defense did what the model said it would. It just could not do anything about 157 attempts, the second-highest count of Herbert's 11 UFC fights behind the 178 he threw at Rolando Bedoya in 2024.

And the body attack is not new. Herbert went to the body 17 times against Kyle Nelson, 23 against Farès Ziam and 27 against Bedoya. His first four UFC fights produced six body strikes combined. On the numbers, somewhere around 2022 he became a different kind of striker, and I spent a preview describing the old one: the knockdown artist with six UFC knockdowns and an 8-inch reach advantage. He scored no knockdown on Saturday. He did not need one.

Grading the preview honestly

The key was control time. Right key, wrong direction. Herbert out-controlled Camilo by 14 seconds over 15 minutes, and won the round where the control was decided.

The table I led with now needs an update. Here is Herbert's UFC record split the same way, with Saturday added:

ResultFightsOpponent control timeOpponent takedowns
Wins57:08 combined2 of 9
Draw13:142 of 3
Losses518:45 combined9 of 25

The losses column has not moved. But the wins column now holds two fights where Herbert spent close to three minutes being held and won anyway: Nelson controlled him for 3:06 in 2022, Camilo for 2:41 on Saturday. The Nelson fight was sitting in my own table on Saturday morning. The difference in both is what Herbert did with his own minutes, 5:57 of control against Nelson, 2:55 against Camilo. What separates his wins from his losses is not whether someone holds him. It is whether he gets his turn.

The model's biggest reason was age, 25 against 38. The sportsbook consensus put Herbert at about 37 percent with the margin out. On our pick'em, 13 of 18 entries took Camilo; one person picked Herbert by decision, and that person can enjoy the moment. Herbert is now 15-6-1, and 5-5-1 in the UFC. Camilo drops to 11-4.

Camilo is 25 and his takedown entries are good. The fix is not in the shot. It is in the 20 seconds after it, the moment where the man underneath starts turning, and both of his UFC losses live in that window. Our full round-by-round numbers are on the bout page, and Herbert's profile has the rest of his career.

I said Herbert's whole UFC career was a record of what happens when somebody holds him down. Turns out it was also a record of what happens when he gets back up.

Ask UFCalendar AI